Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
> On 11/4/06, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb cesmail.net> wrote:
>> SASADA Koichi wrote:
>> > a) The Ruby evaluator will be YARV.  Ruby will import YARV's
>> limitations
>> >   -> support only native thread, nonsupport Thread.critical,
>>
>> I'm familiar with the "native" thread models for Linux and Windows. I'm
>> not, however, familiar with them for BSD, Solaris or MacOS. Nor do I
>> have any clues as to what operating systems Ruby 1.9.1 or Ruby 2.0 will
>> need to support. Is there some kind of documentation on this?
>>
>> > * YARV Source review
>> >
>> > YARV is developed by me, so the code quality seems low.  Please check
>> > YARV source code and please point out any strange code you see.
>>
>> Do you have a preferred/recommended IDE for this? Right now, I'm
>> thinking about "standardizing" on KDevelop, even though it means I won't
>> be able to develop on Windows or Mac. KDevelop has some hooks for Ruby
>> and Rails, which is my main reason for wanting to use it.
>>
> 
> Not to start a war.. but vim (or gvim) with the 'cscope' plugin is
> insanely cool for reviewing C code.
> 
> -- 
> ML: yarv-dev-en quickml.atdot.net
> Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml
> 
I suppose ... but I'm actually *trying* to start a war. :)

All kidding aside, I don't really like just plain editors for working
with other peoples' code. I really need things like syntax coloring,
debuggers, steppers, etc. -- more or less a full IDE -- when I'm trying
to understand something like Ruby or YARV.

--
ML: yarv-dev-en quickml.atdot.net
Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml