Hi,

Ilmari Heikkinen wrote:
> Yes, YARV's GC is faster.
> 
> Actually, the ruby1.8 version was using RubyInline to do the bottlenecks
> in C (forgot to turn it off), and that's why it's allocating less. YARV
> is running pure ruby codepath, so the performance is even more
> impressive.
> 
> I re-ran the test with inline turned off and ruby1.8 gets 34fps, YARV
> gets 60fps (76% faster!)

Excellent.


>>> kig@bauhaus:~$ ruby-yarv -e 'for d,*f in [[1,2,3]]; p d,f; end'
>>> 1
>>> nil
>> On my environment:
>> $ ./ruby -ve 'for d,*f in [[1,2,3]]; p d,f; end'
>> ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-02-14) [i686-linux]
>> YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 717 (2006-02-22) [opts: ]
>> 1
>> [2, 3]
>>
>>> kig@bauhaus:~$ ruby-yarv -e 'class Object; define_method(:foo){|*args| p
>>> args}; end; 0.foo(1,2,3)'
>>> nil
>> On my environment:
>> $ ./ruby -ve 'class Object; define_method(:foo){|*args| p args}; end;
>> 0.foo(1,2,3)'
>> ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-02-14) [i686-linux]
>> YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 717 (2006-02-22) [opts: ]
>> [1, 2, 3]
> 
> 
> Strange..
> Tried the SVN trunk HEAD:
> $ svn co http://www.atdot.net/svn/yarv/trunk yarv
> $ cd yarv; autoconf && ./configure --program-suffix=-yarv && make
> $ ./ruby-yarv  -ve 'for d,*f in [[1,2,3]]; p d,f; end'
> ruby 2.0.0 (Base: Ruby 1.9.0 2006-02-14) [i686-linux]
> YARVCore 0.4.0 Rev: 470 (2006-02-22) [opts: ]
> 1
> nil
> 
> What might be the reason ? Bad libraries on my machine?

Please try with "miniruby" in your build directory.


Regards,
-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net


-- 
ML: yarv-dev-en quickml.atdot.net
使い方: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml